We kick off the Quarterfinals of TSN.cas 2013 Play of the Year Showdown with a great match-up between Eric Fehr and Pavel Datsyuk. In the Second Round of the 2013 POY Showdown, Datsyuk narrowly defeated Ales Hemsky, squeaking out 50.18 per cent of the votes. Fehr handily beat out Evgeni Malkin, taking 62.32 per cent of the votes. It is Datsyuks creative use of his feet and incredible finishing skills, even while impeded by two defencemen that makes this goal a POY candidate, his second play to make it to Round Three. Fehrs 2013 POY entry encompasses strength, determination and a little razzle-dazzle. The big forward skates the puck across the Boston Bruins blue line, uses some quick stick work to split the defencemen and rips the shot, while falling, past Tuukka Rask to end the game in overtime. You can watch the highlights and make your decision here (http://poy.tsn.ca). Every vote counts so watch all the plays and take part in the TSN.ca Play of the Year Showdown. New Balance Outlet France .Y. - Jerome Samson scored once in regulation and again in the shootout as the St. Destockage New Balance .S. hockey team after paying his dues as an NHL general manager for more than three decades and giving up a lot of his free time to help USA Hockey. http://www.pascherfrancenewbalance.fr/ . The Australian is competing in his final season in Formula One and still looking for his first win this year. He will look to end Vettels run of six straight race wins on Sunday. Webber, who is fifth in the championship, earned his second pole from the past three races and 13th of his career. New Balance Soldes . Gather a group of friends, or find a league to join online, draft your team, set your lineup and compete in a number of different formats. New Balance Pas Cher Chine . Isner, ranked No. 14, won his eighth career singles title and took the title in New Zealand for the second time after his victory in 2010. The match was similar to Isners quarterfinal victory over fifth-seeded Philipp Kohlschreiber which went to three sets, all tiebreaks and contained no breaks of serve. Williams technical director Pat Symonds has become the latest Formula One chief to call for a rethink of team radio restrictions, saying the current system has the potential to breed negligence.Mercedes became the first team to fall foul of the new regulations after the stewards added 10 seconds to Nico Rosbergs race time at the British Grand Prix for a radio call relating to a gearbox issue. The incident has reignited the debate over the radio restrictions, which are designed to prevent engineers from coaching the drivers from the pit wall.Symonds believes the restrictions go too far and says engineers need to be able to warn drivers of potential issues on the car, such as Sergio Perezs brake failure at the Austrian Grand Prix.On the pitwall, we know our rules pretty well -- and normally when something happens, we know what to do, Symonds said. With this, every single race, theres a debate that goes on in the pit lane, oh, we shouldnt do this, what are we going to do?Poor old Perez in Austria, how ridiculous. Youre going to do tens of thousands of pounds worth of damage too the car, because you cant tell a guy his brakes are about to fail? Thats negligent.dddddddddddd. Its not just wrong, its negligent.We have debated the very situation Perez found himself in and we said that if thats the case, well tell the driver to stop, we dont care about a penalty, were not going to risk injuring a driver.Symonds believes the rules need to be revised to allow engineers to talk drivers through some of the more complicated procedures on the car.I dont like it. To me its a team sport and we should work together. If people really do object to us coaching the drivers, I can live with that, but helping them manage the systems? I really dont think thats a problem.But where do you draw the line? Its a team sport and if the driver has to drive the car alone and unaided, should he change his own tyres? Can you imagine that? Where do you draw the line? And where they have drawn the line [on radio communications] is not in a good place. ' ' '