isnt generally spoken of as an unlucky bowler. Is

Coach Damien Hardwick fully expects Richmond will return to finals in 2017, saying his AFL club started a rebuild two years ago.The Tigers finished in the top eight during the past three seasons but currently sit 13th on the ladder, having been one of the leagues biggest disappointments this year.Hardwick has copped the brunt of scrutiny, with a couple of the clubs 12 losses being particularly embarrassing.Tigers president Peggy ONeal and chief executive Brendon Gale were also in the headlines earlier this month amid rumblings about a board challenge.Richmond is expected to make changes to its football department once an off-field review is completed with the help of accountancy firm Ernst & Young.Hardwick is confident his side will be far more competitive next year.I personally think it will be a quick bounce, Hardwick told Fox Footy.I would be disappointed if were not in finals next year.The potential I see in the players weve got I think we will be playing finals next year.Much of the criticism directed at Punt Rd Oval this year has focused on the clubs list and lack of depth.Hardwick has blooded six debutants this year, while veterans Troy Chaplin and Ivan Maric have only played a handful of games.Chaplin has retired, while Maric could be shown the door at seasons end.I speak about the potential that our list has. Weve probably turned over 40 per cent of our list in the last two years, Hardwick said.Which is one of the bigger turnarounds in a club and weve invested heavily in the draft in those last two years.People often say Richmond need to rebuild but we started that two years ago.Weve very thorough in our list management planning.Its been an incredibly disappointing season .. we had to take a little step back to go forward. That step back has been a little bit bigger than I would have liked. Wholesale Air Max . LOUIS -- St. Cheap Air Max Free Shipping . Lack made 20 saves for his third shutout of the season as the Canucks blanked the St. Louis Blues 1-0 in the first post-Olympic game for both teams night. http://www.cheapukairmax.com/ . Detroit and Boston are deadlocked, 1-1, and Tigers manager Jim Leyland could be forgiven if he was caught rationalizing instead of dissecting how his club could blow a 5-1 lead late in Game 2. Air Max Uk Online . The Islanders dealt Thomas Vanek to the Montreal Canadiens after less than a year on Long Island. Meanwhile, the Oilers dealt long-time sniper Ales hemsky to the Ottawa Senators on Wednesday for a fifth-round pick in 2014 and a third-rounder in 2015. Cheap Authentic Air Max . Louis Blues absence from top spot in the TSN. Of the five bowlers India have used in the first two Tests of their West Indies tour, Mohammed Shami is the least experienced. He has also returned only recently from a long lay-off forced by a serious knee injury. But over the course of the series, he has become Virat Kohlis go-to quick bowler in every situation, be it to execute a specific plan to a specific batsman, such as his accurate and hostile use of the bouncer against Darren Bravo, or to come on and bowl with the new ball or a reverse-swinging old ball, or, simply, as the likeliest man to break a partnership.He has become the leader of Indias pace attack, taking over that mantle from Ishant Sharma, a man who has played 56 Tests more than him. Shami did not take the new ball in West Indies first innings in Antigua. That was understandable. He had not played Test cricket for over a year-and-a-half, and Ishant and Umesh Yadav were the incumbent quicks in the team.But Shamis status in the attack changed almost as soon as he began his first spell of the series, in which he dismissed Rajendra Chandrika with an awkwardly rising away-seamer in the corridor. From that spell on, he has looked the most dangerous of Indias three seamers every time India have bowled.Of all of Indias bowlers in the series, fast and slow, West Indies batsmen have achieved their smallest control percentage - 77.05 - against Shami. While the number doesnt paint anything like the full picture of a bowlers effectiveness - West Indies have achieved a better control percentage against R Ashwin (81.25) than against Amit Mishra (79.47), for instance - it does suggest that Shami has kept asking them difficult questions.One interesting number is West Indies run rate against Shami when they have not been in control. Against him, they have scored at 3.33 runs per over off the balls that have had them iin trouble.ddddddddddddAgainst Ishant Sharma, their not-in-control run rate is 2.66, and against Umesh, it is 1.96.This suggests that Shami has tended to find the edge where Ishant and Umesh have beaten it. In West Indies second innings at Sabina Park, Shami conceded 11 fours, of which five came off genuine edges and two others off near-edges, from Jermaine Blackwood playing away from his body and slicing the ball wide of gully.On that frustrating fifth day for Indias bowlers, Shami was probably unlucky not to have taken a wicket or two.Unless its his injury record thats being talked about, Shami isnt generally spoken of as an unlucky bowler. Ishant, on the other hand, has been called that right through his 70-Test career. His unlucky spells, however, are usually characterised by batsmen playing and missing rather than edging and getting away with it.Length has often been spoken of as Ishants major issue, and it has been said that he would become a far more threatening bowler if he pitched the ball half a foot fuller. But in many of his spells, his line has also been half a foot too wide of off stump, allowing batsmen easy leaves outside off stump.In this series, Ishant has seemed to bowl wider than ever. He probably isnt, but it has looked that way because he has often had Shami bowling at the other end and forcing batsmen to play. They have each sent down exactly the same number of overs in the series - 59 - but where batsmen have left 131 balls from Ishant, they have only managed to leave 87 from Shami.Perhaps that is why Shami has eight wickets in the series, at an average of 24.62, and why Ishant only has four, at 45.00. Perhaps that is why Ishant, after 70 Tests, still averages 37.05. ' ' '